Archived E2 FAQ: What should I node?

printable version

This document is not current, and is kept only for archival purposes. Please refer to Everything2 Help for all up-do-date help documents.

What should I node?

A lot of this FAQ is about how to node: the technicalities of E2, style and quality guidelines, and suchlike. A more fundamental question, though, is what to node. This is equally important for a newbie, hesitating before her first writeup, and for an experienced user, searching for worthwhile directions to expand the database.

The declared scope of Everything is, well, everything. There is little or nothing that you may not node, unless you have violated someone else's copyright (or otherwise endangered Everything's legal position). What follows is a collection of maxims which might point you in a healthy direction when you want to node, but are stumped for ideas. They also make good categories to think about your noding; think which one most closely matches what you're currently noding, and plan your research, style, and emphasis accordingly. To make things harder, the following suggestions try their best to contradict each other; this is not a Zen thing, but a reflection of different noding styles. Pick whichever you prefer, or alternate!


Node what you know

This is perhaps the most basic noding style. Everything is an accumulation of knowledge, first and foremost. And the way that knowledge gets there is people like you node it. It's how we got where we are, and it's how we'll go much further. And unlike the rest of the web, Everything is a rated accumulation of knowledge, so truly knowledgeable nodes and noders are preferred, assuring us all of higher quality information. The more you know about a topic, the better your writeup will be: you'll have all the facts and explanations right, and your links will integrate the node right where it belongs in the nodegel. If you know something, share that knowledge!

What are you an expert on? In case you're asking yourself "what could I possibly know?", here are some ideas.


(contrariwise)

Node what you don't know

If you don't know the exact definition of a word, or you realise you know less than you'd like to about a certain subject, and the Everything search box is no help at all, look it up, and then node it. Use E2 to motivate yourself to do a little research into some of those topics you've always been a little fuzzy on, or which you've just encountered. Chances are, your writeups will enlighten quite a few others, when they try the search box... and find your node. Whatever it is you don't know, there are millions of others out there who know even less about it. (And isn't that a comforting thought?) This does not mean you should create question nodes, or nodes telling us what you don't know; these will contain little or no worthwhile information, and any replies belong in a separate node anyway. Instead, use the things you come up with as pointers to important omissions in Everything, and start correcting them. Don't worry if you can't write a complete analysis or definition: if you lay some solid groundwork, other noders will help (eventually).

How do you know what you don't know? Or, rather, how do you notice these things so you can node them?

But if you don't know, how can you node? By doing your research!


Node what everyone likes -- be a populist

Some topics are very popular on Everything. Since E2 is written by everyone, rated by everyone, for everyone, it's a good idea to node what everyone likes. This does not mean "cheap popularity", nor should it encourage you to node (exclusively) for XP. Also, avoid GTKY nodes like the plague! However, if there's a real, substantial topic, which will interest a large body of Everythingians, by all means get noding. If you're noding something very technical or specialised, perhaps you can things simple enough for the layman to understand and enjoy?

Here are some ways to decide what interests (a large proportion of) everyone:


(contrariwise)

Node what you like -- be an elitist

Noding what other people like only goes so far. To really get into noding, try noding what you like best. Forget what other people like. If you're writing about your own pet subject, you probably either know, or can easily research, all the relevant details, and your opinions are bound to be interesting. Plus, you'll have fun writing. It's not always best to ignore the ignorant, but sometimes you'll find it just the thing to do.

You don't have to twist everything around so it's simple enough for everyone to follow, or so it ties in to things everyone is sure to relate to. If you dig advanced mathematics, or you're a jazz expert, and you want to node something truly stupendous (to your mind) don't dumb it down. Node it in all its glory. Other experts (or wannabes) will acknowledge your effort (perhaps not right away, but eventually), and you will have helped transform E2 into a truly in-depth reference. And don't worry: even a few non-cognoscenti will acknowledge (and upvote) your writeup, for style, for obviously important (even if complicated) content, even for the sheer elitism of it all.


Node what people will read

Don't write what nobody will want to read. E2 is here to let writers deploy their writing where readers can easily get to them.

You obviously can't predict exactly who or how many of the E2 community will want to read your node, but always try to keep this important criterion in mind. Don't node anything so narrow in outlook, only you could care. Don't node something which can never be properly integrated (linked) into the database, and which is unlikely to be searched for (or how will anyone ever get to it?). If you're writing for yourself -- keep it in the sock drawer. If you're noding it on E2, you probably want others to read your stuff.

Of particular importance is the relevance of what you node, not just to today's noders (who, admittedly, will see it first on ENN and give it the first dozen or so votes either way), but to tomorrow's noders, too. Everything is recording knowledge and information, and these things should be preserved for posterity. If what you node today will be boring junk next week, or next year, then that's also the limit of your gain (and everyone's). But if it's still being read (and, yes, elaborated on) ten, twenty, or fifty years from now, you've made your own tiny mark on the body of knowledge that is Everything. Besides, taking the long view will often humble you just enough to put in that extra bit of effort researching, editing, or formulating a concise opinion. So node for the ages.

This does not mean you cannot node current events or fads. Au contraire, in a few years they'll all be history, and your insider's insigts might be all the more worthwhile. But only if you took care to explain what might be obvious to you today, but will eventually be the subject of much debate and research...


(contrariwise)

No, hang on there is no "contrariwise" to that. Just node what people will read.


haggai submitted this

back to

Everything FAQ



This writeup is, among other things, an assimilation of two honoured and much-linked nodes: Node what you know and Node what you don't know, two good rules for noding coined (and elucidated) by dem bones. Also, to a lesser extent, some material was influenced by Node for the ages, and my own call to Node what you google (which had a mixed reception, probably because of the well-intentioned aversion to noding about noding). On the whole though, I've tried to convey some noding ideals which seem to be (or which should be) prevalent on E2. They are guidelines, not rules.